From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Armstrong Surgical Ctr. v. Armstrong Cty. Mem. Hosp

U.S.
Jun 26, 2000
530 U.S. 1261 (2000)

Summary

finding inference of discrimination where plaintiff's duties were transferred to employees eighteen and twenty-five years younger than him

Summary of this case from Elliott v. British Tourist Authority

Opinion

No. 99-905.

June 26, 2000.


Certiorari Denied

C.A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 185 F. 3d 154.


Summaries of

Armstrong Surgical Ctr. v. Armstrong Cty. Mem. Hosp

U.S.
Jun 26, 2000
530 U.S. 1261 (2000)

finding inference of discrimination where plaintiff's duties were transferred to employees eighteen and twenty-five years younger than him

Summary of this case from Elliott v. British Tourist Authority

recognizing that some early decisions allowed individuals to obtain injunctive relief but concluding that "Congress vested the power to obtain injunctive relief solely with the FTC."

Summary of this case from Trenton v. Experian Info. Sols., Inc.

noting that evidence that an employee was replaced shortly after discharge undermines explanation of downsizing or reduction-in-force

Summary of this case from Farulla v. New York School Construction Authority

stating that central purpose of the FCRA is to ensure the confidentiality, accuracy, relevancy, and proper utilization of consumers' credit information

Summary of this case from Saturno v. Dovenmuehle Funding
Case details for

Armstrong Surgical Ctr. v. Armstrong Cty. Mem. Hosp

Case Details

Full title:ARMSTRONG SURGICAL CENTER, INC. v. ARMSTRONG COUNTY MEMORIAL HOSPITAL ET AL

Court:U.S.

Date published: Jun 26, 2000

Citations

530 U.S. 1261 (2000)

Citing Cases

Sellers v. BNSF Ry. Co.

"The purpose of this step is 'to force the defendant to give an explanation for its conduct, in order to…

Williams v. CVS Pharmacy, Inc.

"The purpose of this step is to force the defendant to give an explanation for its conduct, in order to…