From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Aris v. Big Ten Taxi Corp.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
May 4, 1971
441 F.2d 536 (5th Cir. 1971)

Opinion

No. 31149 Summary Calendar.

Rule 18, 5th Cir.; see Isbell Enterprises, Inc. v. Citizens Casualty Co. of New York et al., 5th Cir. 1970, 431 F.2d 409, Part I.

May 4, 1971.

Peter Aris, pro se.

G.A. Haddad, Miami, Fla., Patrick H. Mears, Gen. Counsel, Tallahassee, Fla., James R. Parks, Samuel O. Hoffman of Preddy, Haddad, Kutner Hardy, P.A., Miami, Fla., for respondents-appellees.

Before WISDOM, COLEMAN and SIMPSON, Circuit Judges.



Peter Aris has appealed from the district court's dismissal of his petition for review of an order of the Florida Supreme Court denying certiorari. The district court correctly held that it lacked jurisdiction over the subject matter of the suit. See 28 U.S.C. § 1331 et seq., 1257(3); Iacaponi v. New Amsterdam Casualty Company, W.D.Pa. 1966, 258 F. Supp. 880, 884, affirmed 379 F.2d 311, cert. denied 1968, 389 U.S. 1054, 88 S.Ct. 802, 19 L.Ed.2d 849. The order appealed from is due to be and is hereby affirmed.

Affirmed.


Summaries of

Aris v. Big Ten Taxi Corp.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
May 4, 1971
441 F.2d 536 (5th Cir. 1971)
Case details for

Aris v. Big Ten Taxi Corp.

Case Details

Full title:Peter ARIS, Petitioner-Appellant, v. BIG TEN TAXI CORPORATION, Employers…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit

Date published: May 4, 1971

Citations

441 F.2d 536 (5th Cir. 1971)

Citing Cases

ZURICH SPECIALTIES LONDON v. VILLAGE OF BELLWOOD, IL

That was because the amount of potential indemnity could not be considered and because plaintiff had to…

Murray v. Leach

Expounding upon this principle in its original opinion in Dasher v. Supreme Court of Texas, 650 F.2d 711 (5th…