From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ariba v. Emptoris

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit
Jan 8, 2010
No. 2009-1230 (Fed. Cir. Jan. 8, 2010)

Opinion

No. 2009-1230.

DATED January 8, 2010.

Michael T. Renaud, Pepper Hamilton LLP, of Boston, Massachusetts, argued for plaintiff-appellee. With him on the brief were Lana A. Gladstein. Robert T. Haslam, Covington Burling LLP, of Redwood City, California, argued for defendant-appellant. With him on the brief were Amy K. Van Zant; andRobert D. Fram, and Nathan E. Shafroth, of San Francisco, California.

Appealed from: United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas In CASE NO(S). 9:07-CV-90 Judge Ron Clark.

Per Curiam (RADER, PROST, and MOORE, Circuit Judges).


Judgment

This CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is

ORDERED and ADJUDGED:


AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.


Summaries of

Ariba v. Emptoris

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit
Jan 8, 2010
No. 2009-1230 (Fed. Cir. Jan. 8, 2010)
Case details for

Ariba v. Emptoris

Case Details

Full title:ARIBA, INC., Plaintiff-Appellee, v. EMPTORIS, INC., Defendant-Appellant

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit

Date published: Jan 8, 2010

Citations

No. 2009-1230 (Fed. Cir. Jan. 8, 2010)

Citing Cases

Lecat's Ventriloscope v. MT Tool & Mfg.

under Section 112, concluding that "a person of ordinary skill in the art would not understand whether the…

Customedia Techs., LLC v. Dish Networks Corp.

Likewise, Defendants have cited Ariba, Inc. v. Emptoris, Inc., which found an improper mixed method-apparatus…