From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Arend v. Liverpool, New York and Philadelphia S.S. Co.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
May 13, 1873
53 N.Y. 606 (N.Y. 1873)

Summary

In Arend v. Liverpool, etc., Co., 6 Lans. 457; affirmed, 53 N.Y. 606, the court said: "The importer of the cask of wine, after learning that the defendants had suffered a loss of the wine, assigned his claim against the defendants to the plaintiff, who brought the action.

Summary of this case from Livingston v. Spero

Opinion

Argued May 6, 1873

Decided May 13, 1873

J.W. Gerard, Jr., for the appellant.

Louis H. Rowan for the respondent.


Agree to affirm. No opinion.

Judgment affirmed.


Summaries of

Arend v. Liverpool, New York and Philadelphia S.S. Co.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
May 13, 1873
53 N.Y. 606 (N.Y. 1873)

In Arend v. Liverpool, etc., Co., 6 Lans. 457; affirmed, 53 N.Y. 606, the court said: "The importer of the cask of wine, after learning that the defendants had suffered a loss of the wine, assigned his claim against the defendants to the plaintiff, who brought the action.

Summary of this case from Livingston v. Spero
Case details for

Arend v. Liverpool, New York and Philadelphia S.S. Co.

Case Details

Full title:OTTO AREND, Respondent, v . THE LIVERPOOL, NEW YORK AND PHILADELPHIA…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: May 13, 1873

Citations

53 N.Y. 606 (N.Y. 1873)

Citing Cases

Livingston v. Spero

" In Arend v. Liverpool, etc., Co., 6 Lans. 457; affirmed, 53 N.Y. 606, the court said: "The importer of the…