From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Arcuri v. Schoch

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Sep 24, 2015
6:15-CV-0798 (DNH/TWD) (N.D.N.Y. Sep. 24, 2015)

Opinion

6:15-CV-0798 (DNH/TWD)

09-24-2015

SUSAN M. ARCURI, Plaintiff, v. MAJOR KEVIN SCHOCH, BETTINA CARMEN, Defendants.

APPEARANCES: SUSAN M. ARCURI Plaintiff, Pro se 60 Pond Lane Utica, NY 13501


APPEARANCES: SUSAN M. ARCURI
Plaintiff, Pro se
60 Pond Lane
Utica, NY 13501
DAVID N. HURD United States District Judge DECISION and ORDER

Pro se plaintiff Susan M. Arcuri brought this action alleging violations of the Americans with Disabilities Act ("ADA"), 42 U.S.C. § 12101. On July 2, 2015, the Honorable Thérèse Wiley Dancks, United States Magistrate Judge, advised by Report-Recommendation that plaintiff's complaint be dismissed without prejudice to submit an amended complaint. No objections to the Report-Recommendation were filed. As discussed in the Report-Recommendation, if plaintiff wishes to amended complaint, such complaint shall comply with the requirements of Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 8.

Based upon a de novo review of the portions of the Report-Recommendation, the Report-Recommendation is accepted in whole. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1).

Therefore, it is ORDERED that:

1. Plaintiff's complaint in this action is DISMISSED, in its entirety, with leave to amend within thirty (30) days of the date of this Decision and Order. Plaintiff is reminded that any amended complaint will replace her prior complaint in its entirety;

2. In the event plainitff fails to file an amended complaint within thirty (30) days of the date of this Decision and Order, this case will be closed and judgment entered accordingly without further order; and

3. The Clerk serve a copy of this Decision and Order upon plaintiff in accordance with the Local Rules.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

/s/_________

United States District Judge

Dated: September 24, 2015

Utica, New York


Summaries of

Arcuri v. Schoch

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Sep 24, 2015
6:15-CV-0798 (DNH/TWD) (N.D.N.Y. Sep. 24, 2015)
Case details for

Arcuri v. Schoch

Case Details

Full title:SUSAN M. ARCURI, Plaintiff, v. MAJOR KEVIN SCHOCH, BETTINA CARMEN…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Date published: Sep 24, 2015

Citations

6:15-CV-0798 (DNH/TWD) (N.D.N.Y. Sep. 24, 2015)

Citing Cases

Welch v. Bio-Reference Labs., Inc.

"To plead a Title I violation, a plaintiff must allege that (1) the defendant is subject to the ADA; (2)…

Stanford v. N.Y.S. Office of Children & Family Servs.

Further, Magistrate Judge Hummel correctly determined that Plaintiff's ADA claim cannot proceed with respect…