imposing Rule 11 sanctions because, among other things, giving misleading reports to media demonstrated improper purpose motives (including intent to embarrass)
Summary of this case from Whitehead v. Food Max of Mississippi, Inc.No. 94-2060.
October 2, 1995.
C.A. 9th Cir. Motion of Kaiser Foundation Health Plan, Inc., for leave to file a brief as amicus curiae granted. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 43 F. 3d 1244.
imposing Rule 11 sanctions because, among other things, giving misleading reports to media demonstrated improper purpose motives (including intent to embarrass)
Summary of this case from Whitehead v. Food Max of Mississippi, Inc.accounting decisions "represent precisely the type of `certified' information on which section 11 permits non-experts to rely"
Summary of this case from In re Dynegy, Inc. Securities LitigationFull title:ARCO PRODUCTS CO. v. GRAHAM OIL CO
Court:U.S.
Date published: Oct 2, 1995
Claimant seeks that the stay be lifted on account of the stipulation attached to the Memorandum in Support of…
Cavalier Manufacturing, Inc. v. JacksonThe United States Supreme Court has not addressed this issue, and the federal circuit and district courts are…