From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Arastra Ltd. Partnership v. City of Palo Alto

United States District Court, N.D. California
Jul 1, 1976
417 F. Supp. 1125 (N.D. Cal. 1976)

Opinion

No. C-72-2305 RHS.

July 1, 1976.

Marvin G. Burns, Fulop, Rolston, Burns McKittrick, John Petrasich, Beverly Hills, Cal., Robert S. Webber, Burlingame, Cal., for plaintiff.

Robert K. Booth, Jr., City Atty., Palo Alto, Cal., Fred Caploe, Atkinson, Farasyn, Smith Caploe, Mountain View, Cal., William J. Turner, Jackson, Turner Mulcare, Ronald Mulcare, Burlingame, Cal., for defendant.


ORDER VACATING AND SETTING ASIDE DECISION


Pursuant to stipulation and good cause appearing therefor, it is hereby ordered that the pleadings herein are withdrawn and that the Decision of the Court filed herein on September 15, 1975, and reported in 401 F. Supp. 962 be, and the same hereby is, vacated, set aside, and expunged.

It is further ordered that the foregoing portions of this Order be published in the Federal Supplement.

This Order shall not be effective until a dismissal with prejudice is signed by counsel for both parties and filed.


Summaries of

Arastra Ltd. Partnership v. City of Palo Alto

United States District Court, N.D. California
Jul 1, 1976
417 F. Supp. 1125 (N.D. Cal. 1976)
Case details for

Arastra Ltd. Partnership v. City of Palo Alto

Case Details

Full title:ARASTRA LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, a limited partnership, Plaintiff, v. CITY OF…

Court:United States District Court, N.D. California

Date published: Jul 1, 1976

Citations

417 F. Supp. 1125 (N.D. Cal. 1976)

Citing Cases

U.S. v. 3.66 A. of Land, in Cty. and Cty. of S.F.

The amicus brief submitted on behalf of Cliffside Properties, Inc., also relies almost exclusively on state…

Frisco Land Mining Co. v. State of California

The subdivider relies upon a series of cases in which a governmental agency has undertaken inequitable zoning…