From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Aprea v. Cipolla

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jan 1, 1919
187 App. Div. 894 (N.Y. App. Div. 1919)

Opinion

January, 1919.


Order reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion granted, with ten dollars costs. The agreement under which plaintiff was employed states that plaintiff "takes charge as partner of the metal department with one-half share of the net profits." This distinguishes the case at bar from the cases cited by the respondent and entitled the plaintiff to examine the books of the defendant to ascertain the amount of the net profits during the time covered by the complaint. ( Thomas v. Waite Co., 113 App. Div. 494; Sullivan v. Ryan-Parker Construction Co., No. 1, 148 id. 243.) Jenks, P.J., Mills, Putnam, Kelly and Jaycox, JJ., concurred.


Summaries of

Aprea v. Cipolla

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jan 1, 1919
187 App. Div. 894 (N.Y. App. Div. 1919)
Case details for

Aprea v. Cipolla

Case Details

Full title:PLACIDO APREA, Appellant, v. ANTHONY CIPOLLA, Respondent

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jan 1, 1919

Citations

187 App. Div. 894 (N.Y. App. Div. 1919)

Citing Cases

Schreier v. Mascola

g proceeding itself (see Papazoglou v Papazoglou, 69 A.D.2d 855; Lo Verde v Interex Design Equip. Corp., 54…

Burns v. Lipson

I think the motion for discovery was properly granted. It seems to be settled even under the Code of Civil…