From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Antonelli v. Marquez

United States District Court, E.D. Arkansas, Helena Division
Jul 14, 2008
2:08CV00003 JMM/HDY (E.D. Ark. Jul. 14, 2008)

Opinion

2:08CV00003 JMM/HDY.

July 14, 2008


ORDER


The Court has reviewed the Proposed Findings and Recommended Partial Disposition submitted by United States Magistrate Judge H. David Young and Plaintiff's objections. After carefully considering Plaintiff's objections and making a de novo review of the record in this case, the Court concludes that the Proposed Findings and Recommended Partial Disposition should be, and hereby are, approved and adopted in their entirety as this Court's findings in all respects.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that:

1) Plaintiff shall be allowed to file a Second Amended Complaint that clarifies the nature of his allegations related to his claim of retaliatory discipline against Defendants DePoorter and Phillips set forth in his Claim no. 1, as outlined in section A above;

2) The remainder of the claims alleged are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted.


Summaries of

Antonelli v. Marquez

United States District Court, E.D. Arkansas, Helena Division
Jul 14, 2008
2:08CV00003 JMM/HDY (E.D. Ark. Jul. 14, 2008)
Case details for

Antonelli v. Marquez

Case Details

Full title:MICHAEL ANTONELLI Reg. # 04053-164 PLAINTIFF v. MARQUEZ, et al. DEFENDANTS

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Arkansas, Helena Division

Date published: Jul 14, 2008

Citations

2:08CV00003 JMM/HDY (E.D. Ark. Jul. 14, 2008)

Citing Cases

Rogers v. McLane

In sum, Rogers has pleaded facts demonstrating, at best, speculative harm, which is insufficient to support a…