From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Anonymous v. Anonymous

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jul 3, 1997
241 A.D.2d 353 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)

Opinion

July 3, 1997

Appeal from Supreme Court, New York County (Fern Fisher-Brandveen, J.).


As there are no exigent circumstances and there is a showing that the motion court gave proper consideration to the criteria specified in Domestic Relations Law § 236 (B) (6), the pendente lite award herein will not be disturbed. The best remedy for any perceived inequities is a prompt trial ( see, Halperin v. Halperin, 234 A.D.2d 59; Aron v. Aron, 216 A.D.2d 98; Lowe v. Lowe, 211 A.D.2d 595; Cohen v. Cohen, 208 A.D.2d 482).

Concur — Milonas, J. P., Williams, Mazzarelli and Andrias, JJ.


Summaries of

Anonymous v. Anonymous

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jul 3, 1997
241 A.D.2d 353 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)
Case details for

Anonymous v. Anonymous

Case Details

Full title:ANONYMOUS, Respondent-Appellant, v. ANONYMOUS, Appellant-Respondent

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Jul 3, 1997

Citations

241 A.D.2d 353 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)
660 N.Y.S.2d 972

Citing Cases

Vinik v. Lee

2011, which, to the extent appealed from as limited by the briefs, upon plaintiff's motion for pendente lite…

Sumner v. Sumner

Before: Lerner, J.P., Saxe, Buckley, Friedman, Marlow, JJ. We decline to disturb the pendente lite award,…