From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Angela A.B. v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec.

United States District Court, Southern District of Ohio
Mar 14, 2022
2:20-cv-6024 (S.D. Ohio Mar. 14, 2022)

Opinion

2:20-cv-6024

03-14-2022

Angela A.B., Plaintiff, v. Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant.


Magistrate Judge Elizabeth P. Deavers

OPINION AND ORDER

SARAH D. MORRISON, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

This matter is before the Court for consideration of the Objections filed by the Plaintiff Angela A.B. (ECF No. 28) to the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge recommending that the decision of the Commissioner of the Social Security Commissioner denying benefits be affirmed. (ECF No. 27).

Pursuant to Rule 72(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, after a de novo and careful determination of the record, the Court concludes that the decision of the Commissioner “is supported by substantial evidence and was made pursuant to proper legal standards.” Rogers v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec., 486 F.3d 234, 241 (6th Cir. 2007). The issues raised in the Plaintiff's Objections have been considered and correctly addressed by the Magistrate Judge.

The Court ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge. (ECF No. 27.) The decision of the Commissioner denying disability benefits in this case is AFFIRMED. Judgment shall be rendered in favor of the Commissioner. The Clerk shall terminate this case from the Court's docket.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Angela A.B. v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec.

United States District Court, Southern District of Ohio
Mar 14, 2022
2:20-cv-6024 (S.D. Ohio Mar. 14, 2022)
Case details for

Angela A.B. v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec.

Case Details

Full title:Angela A.B., Plaintiff, v. Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, Southern District of Ohio

Date published: Mar 14, 2022

Citations

2:20-cv-6024 (S.D. Ohio Mar. 14, 2022)

Citing Cases

Fauvie v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec.

See, e.g., Lisa Y. v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec., __ F.Supp.3d__, No. C21-5207, 2021 WL 5177363, at *6 (W.D. Wash.…

Epps v. Kijakazi

Accordingly, the Complaint does not comply with Rule 8. See Glenn B. v. Kijakazi, No. 21-CV-00609, 2022 WL…