From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Andrews v. Haygood

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Dec 1, 2008
669 S.E.2d 310 (N.C. 2008)

Summary

holding that the "one-third limitation" on lien claims under North Carolina Medicaid statute "comports with Ahlborn by providing a reasonable method for determining the State's medical reimbursements"

Summary of this case from Russell v. Agency for Health Care

Opinion

No. 57A07-2

11 December 2008


The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 14th day of August 2008 by Intervenor (NCDHHS) to Strike Reply Brief:

"Motion Denied by order of the Court in conference this the 11th day of December 2008.


Summaries of

Andrews v. Haygood

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Dec 1, 2008
669 S.E.2d 310 (N.C. 2008)

holding that the "one-third limitation" on lien claims under North Carolina Medicaid statute "comports with Ahlborn by providing a reasonable method for determining the State's medical reimbursements"

Summary of this case from Russell v. Agency for Health Care

concluding that the North Carolina statutes conflict with federal Medicaid law by allowing the state to recover from a recipient funds that were for purposes other than medical expenses

Summary of this case from E.M.A. ex rel. Plyler v. Cansler
Case details for

Andrews v. Haygood

Case Details

Full title:Re: Andrews v. Haygood

Court:Supreme Court of North Carolina

Date published: Dec 1, 2008

Citations

669 S.E.2d 310 (N.C. 2008)

Citing Cases

E.M.A. ex rel. Plyler v. Cansler

Thereafter, the district court stayed the action pending final review in the North Carolina Supreme Court of…

Scharba v. Everett L. Braden, Ltd.

F. Legislative Considerations and Judicial Deference The Florida courts have also recognized, as did the…