From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Andrews v. Barrett

Court of Appeal of California, First District, Division Two
Sep 24, 1929
100 Cal.App. 801 (Cal. Ct. App. 1929)

Opinion

Docket No. 6624.

September 24, 1929.

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Alameda County. James G. Quinn, Judge. Affirmed.

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

Girard N. Richardson for Appellant.

Breed, Burpee Robinson for Respondent.


This is an application for a writ of mandate to compel the municipal authorities to issue to the plaintiff a building permit. It was tried one week later than the action entitled Andrews v. City of Piedmont, ante, p. 700 [ 281 P. 78], this day filed. [1] While the actions were tried separately, the parties stipulated that the evidence in each case could be used in the other; that the reporters' transcripts could be included in one transcript; that the clerk's transcripts could be included in one transcript, and that all of the briefs could be considered in each case.

On the authority of Andrews v. City of Piedmont, supra, the judgment is affirmed.

Nourse, J., and Koford, P.J., concurred.


Summaries of

Andrews v. Barrett

Court of Appeal of California, First District, Division Two
Sep 24, 1929
100 Cal.App. 801 (Cal. Ct. App. 1929)
Case details for

Andrews v. Barrett

Case Details

Full title:F.A. ANDREWS, Respondent, v. R.H. BARRETT, as Building Inspector, etc.…

Court:Court of Appeal of California, First District, Division Two

Date published: Sep 24, 1929

Citations

100 Cal.App. 801 (Cal. Ct. App. 1929)
281 P. 79

Citing Cases

Barrett v. Superior Court

STURTEVANT, J. After the remittiturs were filed in Andrews v. Barrett, 100 Cal.App. 801 [ 281 P. 79], and…