From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Andresen v. Maryland

U.S.
Oct 6, 1975
423 U.S. 822 (1975)

Opinion

No. 74-1646.

October 6, 1975.


Ct. Sp. App. Md. Certiorari granted limited to Questions I and II presented by the petition which read as follows:

"I. May an attorney at law, who is a sole practitioner, invoke his privilege against self-incrimination under Amendment V to the Constitution of the United States, to prevent the introduction of his personal handwritten notes and memoranda, books and records, which were seized from his desk and files in his personal office, under a search warrant held to be otherwise reasonable, into evidence against him at his criminal trial?

"II. Was the search of petitioner's offices violative of Amendment IV to the Constitution of the United States?" Reported below: 24 Md. App. 128, 331 A. 2d 78.


Summaries of

Andresen v. Maryland

U.S.
Oct 6, 1975
423 U.S. 822 (1975)
Case details for

Andresen v. Maryland

Case Details

Full title:ANDRESEN v. MARYLAND

Court:U.S.

Date published: Oct 6, 1975

Citations

423 U.S. 822 (1975)

Citing Cases

Narragansett Elec. v. Rhode Island Comm., Human Rights

Julius C. Michaelson, Attorney General, R. Daniel Prentiss, Special Asst. Attorney General, for respondent.…

Bklyn. Gas v. Human Rights

On this point, the majority's concern is needless; the petitioner has a readily available remedy if indeed…