From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Anderson v. DiNapoli

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Mar 26, 2015
126 A.D.3d 1278 (N.Y. App. Div. 2015)

Opinion

519038

03-26-2015

In the Matter of Sharon L. ANDERSON, Petitioner, v. Thomas P. DiNAPOLI, as State Comptroller, Respondent.

 Chiacchia & Fleming, LLP, Hamburg (Andrew P. Fleming of counsel), for petitioner. Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, Albany (William E. Storrs of counsel), for respondent.


Chiacchia & Fleming, LLP, Hamburg (Andrew P. Fleming of counsel), for petitioner.

Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, Albany (William E. Storrs of counsel), for respondent.

Before: McCARTHY, J.P., EGAN JR., DEVINE and CLARK, JJ.

Opinion

DEVINE, J.Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of respondent which denied petitioner's application for accidental disability retirement benefits.

In 2007, petitioner was injured while working as a police officer when she was involved in a car accident. Following the denial of her application for accidental disability retirement benefits, petitioner sought a hearing and redetermination. The Hearing Officer determined that petitioner was not permanently incapacitated from performing her normal employment duties. Respondent made two minor supplemental findings of fact and, after otherwise accepting the Hearing Officer's determination, denied petitioner's application. This CPLR article 78 proceeding ensued.

We confirm. As an applicant for accidental disability retirement benefits, petitioner bore the burden of proving that, among other things, she is permanently incapacitated from performing her job duties (see Matter of Weldon v. DiNapoli, 120 A.D.3d 869, 869, 990 N.Y.S.2d 741 [2014], lv. denied 24 N.Y.3d 914, 2015 WL 233386 [2015] ; Matter of Cepeda v. New York State Comptroller, 115 A.D.3d 1146, 1146, 982 N.Y.S.2d 606 [2014], lv. denied 23 N.Y.3d 906, 2014 WL 2922199 [2014] ). Moreover, respondent is vested with the authority to resolve conflicting medical evidence in that regard and to credit one expert's opinion over another, and his determination will be sustained if supported by substantial evidence (see Matter of Cepeda v. New York State Comptroller, 115 A.D.3d at 1146–1147, 982 N.Y.S.2d 606 ; Matter of Hodio v. DiNapoli, 84 A.D.3d 1686, 1686, 923 N.Y.S.2d 375 [2011] ). In this matter, the Hearing Officer noted that many of the physicians who examined petitioner did not make any determination with respect to the permanency of her condition. While petitioner's primary care physician and another physician, James McGlowan, who performed an independent medical examination on behalf of the New York State and Local Police and Fire Retirement System, did conclude that petitioner was permanently incapacitated, the Retirement System presented the testimony of an orthopedic surgeon, Thomas Pastore, who examined petitioner and concluded that she was not permanently disabled. The Hearing Officer credited Pastore's conclusion over that of the two physicians who disagreed with him, noting that petitioner's primary physician had made inconsistent conclusions regarding permanency and McGlowan had relied primarily on petitioner's subjective complaints of pain, whereas Pastore administered objective tests to determine whether petitioner's physical examination correlated with her complaints.

Inasmuch as Pastore offered a rational, fact-based opinion based upon a physical examination and petitioner's medical records, his testimony provided substantial evidence to support respondent's denial of benefits. Thus, respondent's determination will not be disturbed despite the existence of other evidence to support a different conclusion (see Matter of Weldon v. DiNapoli, 120 A.D.3d at 870, 990 N.Y.S.2d 741 ; Matter of Cepeda v. New York State Comptroller, 115 A.D.3d at 1147, 982 N.Y.S.2d 606 ; Matter of Hodio v. DiNapoli, 84 A.D.3d at 1686, 923 N.Y.S.2d 375 ). Petitioner's reliance upon the determinations of other agencies is inapposite-such determinations are not binding on respondent (see Matter of Weldon v. DiNapoli, 120 A.D.3d at 870 n., 990 N.Y.S.2d 741 )—and her remaining arguments lack merit.

ADJUDGED that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.

McCARTHY, J.P., EGAN JR. and CLARK, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Anderson v. DiNapoli

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Mar 26, 2015
126 A.D.3d 1278 (N.Y. App. Div. 2015)
Case details for

Anderson v. DiNapoli

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of SHARON L. ANDERSON, Petitioner, v. THOMAS P. DiNAPOLI, as…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.

Date published: Mar 26, 2015

Citations

126 A.D.3d 1278 (N.Y. App. Div. 2015)
6 N.Y.S.3d 189
2015 N.Y. Slip Op. 2547

Citing Cases

Pierce v. DiNapoli

The Comptroller affirmed. Petitioner commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding, and, finding that the…

Walsh v. N.Y. State & Local Emps. Ret. Sys.

The Comptroller is vested with "the authority to resolve conflicts in medical evidence and to credit the…