From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Andersen v. Stockton

The Court of Appeals of Washington, Division One
Jul 1, 1987
48 Wn. App. 1034 (Wash. Ct. App. 1987)

Summary

In Russell v. Stockton, 199 Ala. 48, 74 So. 225, the mortgagee who advanced part of the purchase price was held to have a lien superior to the vendor's lien where that was found to be the intention of the parties.

Summary of this case from Martin v. First National Bank of Opelika

Opinion

No. 17694-3-I.

July 1, 1987. UNREPORTED OPINION

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Whatcom County, No. 83-2-00506-6, Marshall Forrest, J., entered December 5, 1985.


Affirmed by unpublished opinion per Little, J. Pro Tem., concurred in by Durham and Walterskirchen, JJ. Pro Tem.


Summaries of

Andersen v. Stockton

The Court of Appeals of Washington, Division One
Jul 1, 1987
48 Wn. App. 1034 (Wash. Ct. App. 1987)

In Russell v. Stockton, 199 Ala. 48, 74 So. 225, the mortgagee who advanced part of the purchase price was held to have a lien superior to the vendor's lien where that was found to be the intention of the parties.

Summary of this case from Martin v. First National Bank of Opelika
Case details for

Andersen v. Stockton

Case Details

Full title:BLAIR ANDERSEN, ET AL, Respondents, v. RUSSELL E. STOCKTON, ET AL…

Court:The Court of Appeals of Washington, Division One

Date published: Jul 1, 1987

Citations

48 Wn. App. 1034 (Wash. Ct. App. 1987)
48 Wash. App. 1034

Citing Cases

Martin v. First National Bank of Opelika

The fact that a mortgage is made to a person other than the vendor does not prevent its being a purchase…

Planters' Warehouse Commission Co. v. Barnes

The land remained subject to the lien. Thompson v. Sheppard, 85 Ala. 611, 5 So. 334; Knight v. Knight, 113…