From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Anchin, Block Anchin v. Penn. Coal and Coke Corp.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jun 2, 1955
127 N.E.2d 842 (N.Y. 1955)

Opinion

Argued April 20, 1955

Decided June 2, 1955

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, COX, J.

Osmond K. Fraenkel, Harold Epstein and Seymour Heilbron for appellant.

Edward Ross Aranow and Alfred Miller for respondent.


On appeal from judgment: Judgment affirmed, with costs. On appeal from order: Appeal dismissed, upon the ground that the Civil Practice Act (§ 588, subd. 3) does not authorize an appeal to this court by a party in whose favor the Appellate Division has reversed a judgment and granted a new trial. (See Gibbons v. Schwartz, 288 N.Y. 612; Lee v. Gander, 271 N.Y. 568; see, also, Cohen and Karger, Powers of the New York Court of Appeals [1952], pp. 281-282.) No opinion.

Concur: CONWAY, Ch. J., DESMOND, DYE, FULD, FROESSEL, VAN VOORHIS and BURKE, JJ.


Summaries of

Anchin, Block Anchin v. Penn. Coal and Coke Corp.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jun 2, 1955
127 N.E.2d 842 (N.Y. 1955)
Case details for

Anchin, Block Anchin v. Penn. Coal and Coke Corp.

Case Details

Full title:ANCHIN, BLOCK ANCHIN, Respondent, v. PENNSYLVANIA COAL AND COKE…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Jun 2, 1955

Citations

127 N.E.2d 842 (N.Y. 1955)
127 N.E.2d 842

Citing Cases

Winston v. Mezzanine Investments, L.P.

( Chimart Assocs. v Paul, supra, at 572-573; 67 Wall St. Co. v Franklin Natl. Bank, 37 N.Y.2d 245, 248.)…

Weisent v. City of New York

Weinstein, Chayt Bard for respondent. Motion granted and appeal dismissed, with costs and $10 costs of…