From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Anastasiadis v. Mecom

United States District Court, S.D. Texas, Houston Division
Oct 21, 1966
265 F. Supp. 959 (S.D. Tex. 1966)

Summary

holding that the determination that "the action should properly be pursued in the courts of the Kingdom of Greece" in a prior in rem action precluded a new action brought in personam

Summary of this case from Cook v. Champion Tankers as

Opinion

No. 66-H-171.

October 21, 1966.

Mandell Wright, William L. Wood, Jr., Houston, Tex., for libelant.

Baker, Botts, Shepherd Coates, William C. Bullard, Houston, Tex., for respondent.


Memorandum:

Libelant's cause of action is identical to that he alleged in Anastasiadis v. SS Little John, C.A. 63-G-14, S.D.Tex., 346 F.2d 281 (5 CA 1965), rehearing denied 347 F.2d 823 (1965), cert. denied, 384 U.S. 920, 86 S.Ct. 1368, 16 L.Ed. 440 (1966). The only difference is that libelant now proceeds against the vessel's owner in personam, whereas in Little John, the suit was against the vessel in rem. Respondent moves to dismiss without prejudice, and the motion will be granted.

In Little John, this court refused to take jurisdiction and dismissed without prejudice. This court held that the action should properly be pursued in the courts of the Kingdom of Greece. That judgment is res judicata of this subsequent in personam action against the vessel's beneficial owner. Continental Grain Co. v. Barge F.B.L. 585, 364 U.S. 19, 80 S.Ct. 1470, 4 L.Ed.2d 1540 (1960); Burns Bros. v. Central R.R. of N.J., 202 F.2d 910 (2 CA 1953). Furthermore, the present suit should be dismissed for the same reasons the first was. Every factor present now was considered in Little John.


Summaries of

Anastasiadis v. Mecom

United States District Court, S.D. Texas, Houston Division
Oct 21, 1966
265 F. Supp. 959 (S.D. Tex. 1966)

holding that the determination that "the action should properly be pursued in the courts of the Kingdom of Greece" in a prior in rem action precluded a new action brought in personam

Summary of this case from Cook v. Champion Tankers as

In Anastasiadis, our brother Ingraham, then on the district bench, dismissed an attempted in personam action against the beneficial owner of a vessel on grounds of direct estoppel because a former action in rem against the vessel had been dismissed on a finding that the courts of Greece were its proper forum.

Summary of this case from Exxon Corp. v. Chick Kam Choo

In Anastasiadis v. Mecom, 265 F.Supp. 959 (S.D.Tex.1966), the court held that a forum non conveniens dismissal of an in rem suit finding that Greece was a more appropriate forum than the United States precluded relitigation of the forum non conveniens issue in a subsequent in personam action against the vessel's owner.

Summary of this case from Cotemar S.A. De C.V. v. Beaufort
Case details for

Anastasiadis v. Mecom

Case Details

Full title:Iordanis ANASTASIADIS, Libelant, v. John MECOM, Respondent

Court:United States District Court, S.D. Texas, Houston Division

Date published: Oct 21, 1966

Citations

265 F. Supp. 959 (S.D. Tex. 1966)

Citing Cases

Simon v. The M/V HIALEAH

Continental Grain Company vs. The FBL-585, 80 Sup.Ct. 1470, 364 U.S. 19 [ 4 L.Ed.2d 1540] (1960). The cases…

Exxon Corp. v. Chick Kam Choo

There is, to be sure, little authority on the point. Other than Mizokami and Pastewka, discussed above,…