summarizing the consensus among precedent that when the allegation of unjust enrichment is against a third party that indirectly benefitted from a contract between two other parties, "the law requires that the third party have specifically requested the benefit or misled the plaintiff."
Summary of this case from EMC Outdoor, LLC v. StuartNO. 154 EDA 2013
2013-10-04
A. Amin v. Pocono Medical Center
Appeal From: 3432 Civil 2011 (Monroe)
Disposition: Reversed and
Remanded.
summarizing the consensus among precedent that when the allegation of unjust enrichment is against a third party that indirectly benefitted from a contract between two other parties, "the law requires that the third party have specifically requested the benefit or misled the plaintiff."
Summary of this case from EMC Outdoor, LLC v. StuartFull title:A. Amin v. Pocono Medical Center
Court:Superior Court of Pennsylvania.
Date published: Oct 4, 2013
Though Grandesign may arguably have been enriched indirectly, such enrichment is not "deemed unjust." Id.;…