From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ames v. Senco Products, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Dec 13, 1955
1 A.D.2d 658 (N.Y. App. Div. 1955)

Opinion

December 13, 1955


Order vacating service of process on foreign corporation unanimously affirmed, with $20 costs and disbursements to the respondent. While it is true that the limitation on service of process on foreign corporations has been lifted to a considerable extent by the United States Supreme Court in International Shoe Co. v. Washington ( 326 U.S. 310), the settled rule as to the extent or exercise of our jurisdiction in this State has not been changed. Moreover, there are policy considerations which suggest that any change should be effected by legislation rather than by judicial decision. In that way, circumstances affecting the convenience of commerce may be more generally considered. The statutes adopted would provide wider notice to those, "not doing business within the state" who, nevertheless, may have occasion to enter the State for the purpose of making contracts here, or having them performed here.

Concur — Breitel, J.P., Bastow, Botein and Rabin, JJ. [See post, p. 774.]


Summaries of

Ames v. Senco Products, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Dec 13, 1955
1 A.D.2d 658 (N.Y. App. Div. 1955)
Case details for

Ames v. Senco Products, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:BEN AMES et al., Copartners Doing Business as JULIUS M. AMES CO.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Dec 13, 1955

Citations

1 A.D.2d 658 (N.Y. App. Div. 1955)

Citing Cases

Mirabella v. Banco Ind., Argentina

RNED HAND pointed out early in 1948 the two facets of the essential question: (1) how far may the courts go…