From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ames v. McMillan

Supreme Court, Appellate Term
Jun 1, 1900
31 Misc. 784 (N.Y. App. Term 1900)

Opinion

June, 1900.

W.H. Knox, for appellants.

Whalen Dunn, for respondent.


The only question involved in this appeal is one of fact, which has been resolved by the Trial Court in favor of the defendant. We are asked to reverse on the ground that the evidence preponderated in favor of the appellants, but under a long line of decisions in the Court of Common Pleas as well as in this court, such a condition must be obvious and indisputable to justify the Appellate Court in taking such action, a situation which does not at all exist in the case at bar. The judgment must therefore, be affirmed.

Present: BEEKMAN, P.J., GIEGERICH and O'GORMAN, JJ.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.


Summaries of

Ames v. McMillan

Supreme Court, Appellate Term
Jun 1, 1900
31 Misc. 784 (N.Y. App. Term 1900)
Case details for

Ames v. McMillan

Case Details

Full title:CALEB T. AMES et al., Appellants, v . SAMUEL McMILLAN, Respondent

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Term

Date published: Jun 1, 1900

Citations

31 Misc. 784 (N.Y. App. Term 1900)

Citing Cases

Thomason v. Bescher

" And the position is approved by other courts of the highest authority and by writers of established repute.…

Samonds v. Cloninger

This recital is contractual that a consideration exists sufficient to support the contract. Harrell v.…