From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Americana Motel, Inc. v. Johnson

Supreme Court of Texas
Dec 3, 1980
610 S.W.2d 143 (Tex. 1980)

Summary

holding that a party cannot use its own denials to requests for admissions to raise a fact issue to preclude summary judgment

Summary of this case from Carter v. Perry

Opinion

No. B-9755.

December 3, 1980.

Appeal from the 79th District Court, Jim Wells County, C. W. Laughlin, J.

Floyd, Ellzey Lloyd, Thomas C. Wheat, Alice, for petitioner.

Daniel K. Johnson, pro se.


The only point before us is whether an issue of fact has been raised so as to preclude summary judgment. The evidence before the trial judge at the summary judgment hearing consisted of the sworn pleadings of each party, an affidavit by the manager of the Americana Motel in support of its motion, and the Motel's answers to interrogatories and request for admissions. The court of civil appeals reversed the summary judgment for the Motel, and remanded for trial. 604 S.W.2d 293.

Sworn pleadings are not summary judgment evidence in Texas, Hidalgo v. Surety Savings and Loan Association, 462 S.W.2d 540, 545 (Tex. 1971); nor are denials to a request for admissions. Oliver v. Allstate Insurance Company, 456 S.W.2d 558, 560 (Tex.Civ.App.-Dallas 1970, writ dism'd w.o.j.); Sandone v. Dallas Osteopathic Hospital, 331 S.W.2d 476, 479 (Tex.Civ.App.-Amarillo 1959, writ ref'd n.r.e.). The Motel manager's affidavit contains a clear, positive, direct, and credible denial of any dealings with Johnson, and is free from any contradictions and inconsistencies elsewhere in the record. There being no other evidence before the trial court, summary judgment was correctly entered for the Motel.

We regard the holding of the court of civil appeals to be in conflict with Hidalgo, supra, and with Great American Reserve Insurance Company v. San Antonio Plumbing Supply Company, 391 S.W.2d 41, 47 (Tex. 1965), which holds that uncontroverted testimony by an interested party may support a summary judgment if it is "clear, direct and positive and there are no circumstances in evidence tending to discredit or impeach such testimony." Accordingly, the writ of error is granted, and pursuant to Rule 483 of the Texas Rules of Civil Procedure, we reverse the judgment of the court of civil appeals without hearing argument, and affirm the judgment of the trial court.


Summaries of

Americana Motel, Inc. v. Johnson

Supreme Court of Texas
Dec 3, 1980
610 S.W.2d 143 (Tex. 1980)

holding that a party cannot use its own denials to requests for admissions to raise a fact issue to preclude summary judgment

Summary of this case from Carter v. Perry

upholding grant of summary judgment solely based on interested party affidavit

Summary of this case from Vela v. Vela

upholding grant of summary judgment solely based on interested party affidavit

Summary of this case from Vela v. Vela

affirming a summary judgment based solely upon the uncontroverted testimony of an interested party

Summary of this case from Southwestern Gas Pipeline, Inc. v. Scaling

affirming a summary judgment based solely upon the uncontroverted testimony of an interested party

Summary of this case from Maewal v. Adventist Health Systems/Sunbelt, Inc.

affirming a summary judgment based solely upon the uncontroverted testimony of an interested party

Summary of this case from Tobias v. Univ. of Texas

affirming a summary judgment based solely upon the uncontroverted testimony of an interested party

Summary of this case from Gifford-Hill v. Wise Cty Apprsl

affirming a summary judgment based solely upon the uncontroverted testimony of an interested party

Summary of this case from Mary Kay Cosmetics v. North River Ins. Co.

affirming a summary judgment based solely upon the uncontroverted testimony of an interested party

Summary of this case from Am. Quality Roofing v. Ipock

affirming a summary judgment based solely upon the uncontroverted testimony of an interested party

Summary of this case from Amara v. Lain

affirming a summary judgment based solely upon the uncontroverted testimony of an interested party

Summary of this case from Klein v. Dimock

noting that sworn pleadings are not summary-judgment evidence

Summary of this case from Jain v. Plainscapital Bank
Case details for

Americana Motel, Inc. v. Johnson

Case Details

Full title:AMERICANA MOTEL, INC., Petitioner, v. Daniel K. JOHNSON, Respondent

Court:Supreme Court of Texas

Date published: Dec 3, 1980

Citations

610 S.W.2d 143 (Tex. 1980)

Citing Cases

Wheeler v. Security State Bank

Even sworn pleadings are not summary judgment evidence. See Americana Motel, Inc. v. Johnson, 610 S.W.2d 143…

Cuellar v. City of San Antonio

In reviewing summary judgment evidence, it is well established that sworn pleadings and denials to requests…