upholding the validity of state printing statutes which required all public printing of the state to be done in the state
Summary of this case from Reeves, Inc. v. KelleyNo. 72-25.
October 16, 1972, October TERM, 1972.
Affirmed on appeal from D. C. M. D. Fla. MR. JUSTICE BRENNAN and MR. JUSTICE WHITE would note probable jurisdiction and set case for oral argument. MR. JUSTICE BLACKMUN took no part in the consideration or decision of this case. Reported below: 339 F. Supp. 719.
upholding the validity of state printing statutes which required all public printing of the state to be done in the state
Summary of this case from Reeves, Inc. v. KelleyIn Davidson v. Francis, 409 U.S. 904, 93 S.Ct. 223, 34 L.Ed.2d 168 (1972), the Supreme Court affirmed the judgment of a three-judge court, 340 F. Supp. 351 (D.Md. 1972), which construed literally the language of the subsequent regulation, 45 CFR § 233.100, holding that "any father" included one working less than the requisite hours because of a strike and finding no preemption problem with such aid, citing Minter.
Summary of this case from Grinnell Corporation v. HackettFull title:AMERICAN YEARBOOK CO., INC. v. ASKEW, GOVERNOR OF FLORIDA, ET AL
Court:U.S.
Date published: Oct 16, 1972
The United States appealed the decision to the Supreme Court and the decision was affirmed without opinion.…
United States v. State of South CarolinaWe also dismiss the plaintiff-intervenors' causes of action under Sections 1981 and 1983 against all…