From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

American Steel Foundries v. Whitehead

U.S.
Apr 11, 1921
256 U.S. 40 (1921)

Opinion

CERTIORARI TO THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA.

No. 131.

Argued January 12, 13, 1921. Decided April 11, 1921.

Decided on the authority of Baldwin Co. v. Howard Co., ante, 35. Writ of certiorari to review 49 App.D.C. 16; 258 F. 160, dismissed.

THE case is stated in the opinion.

Mr. George L. Wilkinson for petitioner.

The Solicitor General and Mr. Assistant Attorney General Davis, on behalf of respondent, submitted the case without brief or argument. Mr. Nathan Heard for Simplex Electric Heating Company, by special leave of court.


In this case a writ of certiorari was granted by this court on October 13, 1919. 250 U.S. 655. The case involves an application for the registration of a trademark, which was refused by the Examiner in the Patent Office, which decision was affirmed by the Commissioner of Patents and his decision was affirmed by the Court of Appeals of the District of Columbia. 49 App.D.C. 16. This case is ruled by Nos. 139 and 113, just decided, ante, 35. As the writ of certiorari in this case, for the reasons stated in the opinion in No. 139, was improvidently granted, it follows that the cause must be dismissed for want of jurisdiction, and it is

So ordered.


Summaries of

American Steel Foundries v. Whitehead

U.S.
Apr 11, 1921
256 U.S. 40 (1921)
Case details for

American Steel Foundries v. Whitehead

Case Details

Full title:AMERICAN STEEL FOUNDRIES v . WHITEHEAD, COMMISSIONER OF PATENTS

Court:U.S.

Date published: Apr 11, 1921

Citations

256 U.S. 40 (1921)

Citing Cases

American Foundries v. Robertson

RESPONSE to questions certified by the Circuit Court of Appeals, upon appeal to that court from a decree of…

Crown Overall Mfg. Co. v. Bee-Bee Frocks

There the word "Simplex" constituted a part of the corporate name of numerous corporations, including the…