From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

American Cyanamid Company v. Rosenblatt

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jun 10, 1965
16 N.Y.2d 706 (N.Y. 1965)

Opinion

Submitted June 7, 1965

Decided June 10, 1965


Motion to amend remittitur granted. Return of remittitur requested and, when returned, it will be amended by adding thereto the following. Upon the appeal herein there was presented and necessarily passed upon a question under the Constitution of the United States, viz.: whether CPLR 302 (subd. [a], par. 2), as construed in this case and applied to defendant, was invalid under the Fourteenth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States. The Court of Appeals, in passing upon this contention, held that CPLR 302 (subd. [a], par. 2), as construed and applied, was valid.


Summaries of

American Cyanamid Company v. Rosenblatt

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jun 10, 1965
16 N.Y.2d 706 (N.Y. 1965)
Case details for

American Cyanamid Company v. Rosenblatt

Case Details

Full title:AMERICAN CYANAMID COMPANY, Respondent, v. MAURICE ROSENBLATT, Appellant

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Jun 10, 1965

Citations

16 N.Y.2d 706 (N.Y. 1965)
261 N.Y.S.2d 898
209 N.E.2d 554

Citing Cases

Knight v. San Jacinto Club, Inc.

To date the United States Supreme Court has not passed on the single-act "long arm" statutes. American…