In American Bank Trust Co. v. Community Hospital of Los Gatos-Saratoga, Inc., 104 Cal.App.3d 219, 226-235, 163 Cal.Rptr. 513, 516-22 (1980), a three-judge panel of the California court of appeals quoted and adopted the strict scrutiny analysis of Graley, asserting but not explaining how the same reasoning would apply under the rational basis test.
Summary of this case from Rudolph v. Iowa Methodist Medical Ctr.1980.
In American Bank Trust Co. v. Community Hospital of Los Gatos-Saratoga, Inc., 104 Cal.App.3d 219, 226-235, 163 Cal.Rptr. 513, 516-22 (1980), a three-judge panel of the California court of appeals quoted and adopted the strict scrutiny analysis of Graley, asserting but not explaining how the same reasoning would apply under the rational basis test.
Summary of this case from Rudolph v. Iowa Methodist Medical Ctr.In American Bank Trust Co. v. Community Hospital of Los Gatos-Saratoga, Inc., 104 Cal.App.3d at 226-35, 163 Cal.Rptr. at 516-22, the California court had before it a statute which provided that, upon request, a tortfeasor health care provider could pay awards for future damages exceeding $50,000 on a periodic basis.
Summary of this case from Rudolph v. Iowa Methodist Medical Ctr.Full title:American Bank Trust Co. v. Community Hospital
Court:Court of Appeal of California
Date published: Jan 1, 1980
See Arneson v. Olson, 270 N.W.2d 125, 133, 135-36 (N.D. 1978) (using means scrutiny test); Simon v. St.…
White v. StateA classification "must be reasonable, not arbitrary, and must rest upon some ground of difference having a…