From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Amdar Co. v. Hahalis

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department
Feb 26, 1990
145 Misc. 2d 987 (N.Y. App. Term 1990)

Opinion

February 26, 1990

Appeal from the Civil Court of the City of New York, New York County, Louis B. York, J.

Finkelstein, Borah, Schwartz, Altschuler Goldstein, P.C. (Jeffrey R. Metz of counsel), for appellant.

Leonard J. Levenson for respondent.


Order entered October 18, 1989 reversed, with $10 costs, and petitioner's motion granted to the extent of severing tenant's counterclaims.

The commercial loft lease between the parties contains the standard provisions proscribing counterclaims in summary proceedings. Such lease provisions are enforceable (Bomze v Jaybee Photo Suppliers, 117 Misc.2d 957). Tenant's counterclaims seek lost business damages allegedly resulting from landlord's negligent elevator maintenance and breach of contract. The claims are not "inextricably related to [landlord's] cause of action for rent" and should have been severed (Sanders v L.K.L. Enters., NYLJ, June 7, 1989, at 21, col 4 [App Term, 1st Dept]; 1587 Broadway Rest. Corp. v Magic Pyramid, NYLJ, Dec. 19, 1979, at 10, col 2 [App Term, 1st Dept]).

OSTRAU, J.P., PARNESS and McCOOE, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Amdar Co. v. Hahalis

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department
Feb 26, 1990
145 Misc. 2d 987 (N.Y. App. Term 1990)
Case details for

Amdar Co. v. Hahalis

Case Details

Full title:AMDAR CO., Appellant, v. ALEXANDROS HAHALIS, Respondent

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department

Date published: Feb 26, 1990

Citations

145 Misc. 2d 987 (N.Y. App. Term 1990)
554 N.Y.S.2d 759

Citing Cases

Lucas v. Florent

As both sides acknowledge, lease terms precluding tenants from pursuing counterclaims in commercial…

W.J. Enter. v. Nomad 28th St. LLC

However, where a lease contains a "waiver of counterclaim" provision, such provision may not be circumvented…