determining that there was no conversion where the plaintiff retained possession of customer information and “could have ... solicited ... customers and attempted to retain them”; finding “no unauthorized possession ... to the exclusion of the rights of [the plaintiff]”
Summary of this case from Muncey v. Eyeglass World, LLCNo. 19204/07.
October 29, 2007.
Torts — Conversion. Trademarks, Trade Names and Unfair Competition — Unfair Competition.
determining that there was no conversion where the plaintiff retained possession of customer information and “could have ... solicited ... customers and attempted to retain them”; finding “no unauthorized possession ... to the exclusion of the rights of [the plaintiff]”
Summary of this case from Muncey v. Eyeglass World, LLCFull title:ALPHA FUNDING GROUP, INC., Plaintiff, v. ASPEN FUNDING LLC, ET AL.,…
Court:Supreme Court of the State of New York, Kings County
Date published: Oct 29, 2007
Second, Sure sufficiently alleges that Boost acquired the confidential information by improper means -…
Pure Power Boot Camp, Inc. v. Warrior Fitness Boot Camp, LLCAn essential element of conversion is “unauthorized dominion” to the exclusion of the rights of the…