From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Alliance Casualty Company v. Miele

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 30, 1936
249 App. Div. 650 (N.Y. App. Div. 1936)

Opinion

November 30, 1936.

Present — Lazansky, P.J., Hagarty, Carswell, Davis and Adel, JJ.


In an action by the insurance company to recover premiums, the defendants interposed counterclaims for legal services and for the amount paid in settlement of a suit when the plaintiff disclaimed liability under its indemnity policy and refused to defend. It was obligated under the terms of the policy to defend suits, whether groundless or not. It failed in its obligation to defend the claim either for workmen's compensation or in the suit subsequently brought. It cannot now complain of the reasonable settlement made by the defendants in the suit. Judgment of the County Court of Nassau county unanimously affirmed, with costs.


Summaries of

Alliance Casualty Company v. Miele

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 30, 1936
249 App. Div. 650 (N.Y. App. Div. 1936)
Case details for

Alliance Casualty Company v. Miele

Case Details

Full title:ALLIANCE CASUALTY COMPANY, Appellant, v. VICTOR MIELE and HUMBERT MIELE…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Nov 30, 1936

Citations

249 App. Div. 650 (N.Y. App. Div. 1936)

Citing Cases

Great Am. Indemnity Co., v. Audlane Realty

Interpreting that clause, I find that the insurance company agrees to defend any actions brought by injured…

Cardinal v. State of New York

What we have here is a suit on an insurance policy, alleging a breach by the insurer in refusing to defend,…