From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Alley v. Maine

U.S.
Jun 1, 2004
541 U.S. 1078 (2004)

Summary

holding that, following a six-hour break, law enforcement officials may reinitiate interrogation in the absence of counsel as long as the defendant has had a reasonable opportunity to contact counsel

Summary of this case from State v. Wessells

Opinion

CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME JUDICIAL COURT OF MAINE.

No. 03-9837.

June 1, 2004.


Sup. Jud. Ct. Me. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 841 A. 2d 803.


Summaries of

Alley v. Maine

U.S.
Jun 1, 2004
541 U.S. 1078 (2004)

holding that, following a six-hour break, law enforcement officials may reinitiate interrogation in the absence of counsel as long as the defendant has had a reasonable opportunity to contact counsel

Summary of this case from State v. Wessells
Case details for

Alley v. Maine

Case Details

Full title:ALLEY v. MAINE

Court:U.S.

Date published: Jun 1, 2004

Citations

541 U.S. 1078 (2004)

Citing Cases

State v. Wessells

Numerous state courts have articulated a similar approach. See People v. Storm, 28 Cal.4th 1007, 124…