holding that issues such as pipeline placement, routing and necessity, which could be raised in an FERC administrative proceeding or an appeal thereof, can only be addressed under the federal scheme for review
Summary of this case from Gulf Crossing Pipeline Co. LLC v. 86.36 Acres of LandNo. 89-56.
June 25, 1990.
holding that issues such as pipeline placement, routing and necessity, which could be raised in an FERC administrative proceeding or an appeal thereof, can only be addressed under the federal scheme for review
Summary of this case from Gulf Crossing Pipeline Co. LLC v. 86.36 Acres of Landfinding employees who had not signed release could not maintain a class action for discrimination where they were seeking to represent class members who had signed releases
Summary of this case from Watts v. ArnoldFull title:ALLEVATO, PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE OF THE ESTATE OF FERRANTINO, et al. v…
Court:U.S.
Date published: Jun 25, 1990
We have held, as have most courts of appeals, that a "series" consists of at least three predicate…
Transcon. Gas Pipe Line Co. v. Permanent Easement for 1.49 AcresSteckman Ridge GP, LLC v. Exclusive Natural Gas Storage Easement Beneath 11.078 Acres, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS…