From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Allen v. McDaniel

United States District Court, D. Nevada
Sep 22, 2010
3:08-CV-00430-RCJ(VPC) (D. Nev. Sep. 22, 2010)

Opinion

3:08-CV-00430-RCJ(VPC).

September 22, 2010


ORDER


Before the Court is the Report and Recommendation of U.S. Magistrate Valerie P. Cooke, (#40) entered on August 31, 2010, recommending granting Defendants' Motion for Sunumary Judgment (#31). No objections have been filed.

Refers to court's docket number.

The Court has conducted it's de novo review in this case, has fully considercd the response of the Defendants, the pleadings and memoranda of the parties and other relevant matters of record pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule IB 3-2. The Court determines that the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation (#40) entered on August 31, 2010, should be adopted and accepted.

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation (#40) entered on August 31, 2010, is adopted and accepted, and Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment (#31) is GRANTED. The Clerk of the Court shall enter Judgment accordingly.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED: this 21st day of September, 2010.


Summaries of

Allen v. McDaniel

United States District Court, D. Nevada
Sep 22, 2010
3:08-CV-00430-RCJ(VPC) (D. Nev. Sep. 22, 2010)
Case details for

Allen v. McDaniel

Case Details

Full title:RICKY ALLEN, Plaintiff, v. E.K. McDANIEL, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, D. Nevada

Date published: Sep 22, 2010

Citations

3:08-CV-00430-RCJ(VPC) (D. Nev. Sep. 22, 2010)

Citing Cases

Landers v. Frakes

The law simply does not require prisons to provide such detailed reporting to its prisoners. See Allen v.…