Opinion
Case No. SC05-2341.
May 31, 2006.
Lower Tribunal Nos. 1D05-3490, 1D04-5022, 00-221 CFA.
As petitioner has failed to demonstrate a clear legal right to the reinstatement of case number 1D05-3490, in the First District Court of Appeal, the petition for writ of mandamus is denied.See Huffman v. State, 813 So. 2d 10, 11 (Fla. 2000) (holding that in order to be entitled to a writ of mandamus, the petitioner must show that he has a clear legal right to performance of the requested act, that the respondent has an indisputable legal duty to perform that act, and that no other adequate remedy exists).
To the extent that the petitioner raises issues other than the reinstatement of case number 1D05-3490, the petition is denied without prejudice.
WELLS, ANSTEAD, QUINCE, CANTERO and BELL, JJ., concur.