From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Allen Co., Inc. v. Pacific Dunlop Holdings Inc.

U.S.
Feb 24, 1994
510 U.S. 1160 (1994)

Summary

affirming the district court's ruling that the 1992 house redistricting plan violated the "one person, one vote" doctrine

Summary of this case from Rural West Tennessee African-American Affairs Council v. Sundquist

Opinion

No. 93-201.

February 24, 1994, OCTOBER TERM, 1993.


C.A. 7th Cir. [Certiorari granted, ante, p. 1083.] Writ of certiorari dismissed under this Court's Rule 46.


Summaries of

Allen Co., Inc. v. Pacific Dunlop Holdings Inc.

U.S.
Feb 24, 1994
510 U.S. 1160 (1994)

affirming the district court's ruling that the 1992 house redistricting plan violated the "one person, one vote" doctrine

Summary of this case from Rural West Tennessee African-American Affairs Council v. Sundquist
Case details for

Allen Co., Inc. v. Pacific Dunlop Holdings Inc.

Case Details

Full title:ALLEN CO., INC. v. PACIFIC DUNLOP HOLDINGS INC

Court:U.S.

Date published: Feb 24, 1994

Citations

510 U.S. 1160 (1994)

Citing Cases

Rural West Tenn. African American v. Sundquist

On September 15, 1993, a three-judge panel of this court held that Chapter 836's House districting scheme was…

Langsdon v. Darnell

On September 15, 1993, a three-judge panel of this court held that Chapter 836's House districting scheme was…