From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Alkatib v. Progressive Paralegal Servs.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO
Nov 20, 2020
Case No. 1:18-cv-2859 (N.D. Ohio Nov. 20, 2020)

Opinion

Case No. 1:18-cv-2859

11-20-2020

M. AMMAR ALKATIB, Plaintiff, v. PROGRESSIVE PARALEGAL SERVICES, LLC, et al., Defendants.


OPINION & ORDER
[Resolving Doc. 46] :

In this employment dispute, the Court enforced a $200,388.76 damages and attorney fees arbitration award for Plaintiff. The Court then entered a judgment lien against Defendants and denied Defendants' motion to stay the judgment.

Doc. 34.

Doc. 36; Doc. 45.

Defendants now appeal and move to stay the judgment under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 62(b). Plaintiff does not object to the requested stay if an appropriate supersedeas bond is posted. Plaintiff asks for a $400,000 supersedeas bond, twice the arbitration award judgment amount. Defendants reply and request a lower bond.

Doc. 46; Doc. 47.

Doc 49.

Doc. 52.

The Court GRANTS Defendants' stay motion provided Defendants obtain an appropriate $300,000 supersedeas bond. This amount balances the parties' interests in preserving the $200,000 judgment with mounting interest, Plaintiff's appellate attorney fees and administrative costs, and Defendants' ability to proceed with their appeal.

In re Cardizem CD Antitr. Litig., 391 F.3d 812, 818 (6th Cir. 2004) (affirming a similar supersedeas bond).

IT IS SO ORDERED Dated: November 20, 2020

s/ James S . Gwin

JAMES S. GWIN

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Alkatib v. Progressive Paralegal Servs.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO
Nov 20, 2020
Case No. 1:18-cv-2859 (N.D. Ohio Nov. 20, 2020)
Case details for

Alkatib v. Progressive Paralegal Servs.

Case Details

Full title:M. AMMAR ALKATIB, Plaintiff, v. PROGRESSIVE PARALEGAL SERVICES, LLC, et…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

Date published: Nov 20, 2020

Citations

Case No. 1:18-cv-2859 (N.D. Ohio Nov. 20, 2020)