From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ali Akber Kiachif v. Philco Intern. Corp.

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Apr 6, 1950
10 F.R.D. 277 (S.D.N.Y. 1950)

Opinion

         Action by Ali Akber Kiachif and another, copartners, trading as A. A. G. H. Kiachif Brothers, agaisnt Philco International Corporation. On defendant's motion for an order directing issuance of letters rogatory to appropriate judicial authority in Teheran, Iran, for examination of a witness on written interrogatories and cross-interrogatories. The United States District Court, McGohey, J., held that where foreign country would not permit examination by commission, motion was granted irrespective of whether witness was biased against plaintiffs.

         Motion granted in accordance with the opinion.

         See also 10 F.R.D. 278.

          Samuel B. Ohlbaum, New York City, for plaintiffs.

          Donovan, Leisure, Newton, Lumbard & Irvine, New York City, for defendant.


          McGOHEY, District Judge.

         This is a motion by defendant for an order directing the issuance of letters regatory to the Appropriate Judicial Authority in Teheran, Iran, for the examination of a witness on written interrogatories and cross-interrogatories. Defendant's attorney avers that the Kingdom of Iran will not permit examination by commission, and this is not contraverted by the plaintiffs.

         Plaintiffs' attorney objects to interrogatories and suggests the issuance of an open commission providng that defendant pay plaintiff's expenses and a reasonable counsel fee. It is claimed that the witness is biased against the plaintiffs. If this be so, there is no reason why it cannot be disclosed by appropriate interrogatories.

         Justice and the necessities of this case require the issuance of letters rogatory, Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Rule 28(b), 28 U.S.C.A., but the court is not convinced that the situation is so unusual as to call for oral interrogatories. See De Villeneuve v. Morning Journal Ass'n, S.D.N.Y., 206 F. 70. The motion is granted and the trial will be stayed until the due return of the letters and the depositions.

         The order to be submitted will provide for the filing and service of the direct interrogatories within ten days after the making of the order herein and that cross-interrogatories shall be filed and served within ten days from the service of the direct interrogatories. Objections to interrogatories and cross-interrogatories shall be presented to the court on two days' notice and within ten days after the filing and service of the matter objected to.


Summaries of

Ali Akber Kiachif v. Philco Intern. Corp.

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Apr 6, 1950
10 F.R.D. 277 (S.D.N.Y. 1950)
Case details for

Ali Akber Kiachif v. Philco Intern. Corp.

Case Details

Full title:ALI AKBER KIACHIF et al. v. PHILCO INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION.

Court:United States District Court, S.D. New York

Date published: Apr 6, 1950

Citations

10 F.R.D. 277 (S.D.N.Y. 1950)

Citing Cases

Sandoval v. United Nuclear Corp.

In noting the existent laws in the Soviet Union as well as the expense involved in travel, the supreme court…

Moezie v. Moezie

See United States v. Paraffin Wax, 2255 Bags, 23 F.R.D. 289, 290 (E.D.N.Y. 1959). Code 1961, 14-201; Rule…