From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

ALEXANDER v. SOLA

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Mar 1, 1921
196 App. Div. 886 (N.Y. App. Div. 1921)

Summary

In Alexander v. Sola (Sup.Ct.) 185 N.Y.S. 869, 870, the implied warranty was excluded by "descriptions, quality and condition not guaranteed. Tobacco sold `as is' at time of sale. * * * Examine the goods before buying.

Summary of this case from Bekkevold v. Potts

Opinion

March, 1921.

Present — Clarke, P.J., Laughlin, Dowling, Smith and Greenbaum, JJ.


Application denied, with ten dollars costs. Order signed.


Summaries of

ALEXANDER v. SOLA

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Mar 1, 1921
196 App. Div. 886 (N.Y. App. Div. 1921)

In Alexander v. Sola (Sup.Ct.) 185 N.Y.S. 869, 870, the implied warranty was excluded by "descriptions, quality and condition not guaranteed. Tobacco sold `as is' at time of sale. * * * Examine the goods before buying.

Summary of this case from Bekkevold v. Potts
Case details for

ALEXANDER v. SOLA

Case Details

Full title:EDWIN ALEXANDER v. MARCELINO SOLA and Others

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Mar 1, 1921

Citations

196 App. Div. 886 (N.Y. App. Div. 1921)

Citing Cases

Weisz v. Parke-Bernet Galleries

More importantly, these auction cases for the most part concern business auctions, in which sellers and…

Gould v. Hiram Walker Sons

They are helpful to appellants. Graham v. Healy, 154 App. Div. 76, 138 N.Y.S. 611; Burling v. Brinn, 116…