From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

ALBERTSON v. NIX

Court of Appeals of Indiana
Oct 23, 1944
115 Ind. App. 128 (Ind. Ct. App. 1944)

Opinion

No. 17,280.

Filed October 23, 1944.

1. APPEAL — Briefs — Judgment and Motion for New Trial not Set Out — Exhibits Omitted — No Question Presented. — Where appellant's brief does not set out the judgment of the trial court, the motion for new trial or the substance thereof, the exhibit which it is asserted was erroneously admitted in evidence, or the substance thereof, no question is presented for review. p. 128.

2. APPEAL — Briefs — Sufficiency — Rules Not Relaxed to Point of Requiring Court to Search Record to Reverse. — While the Appellate Court indulges a practical liberality in passing upon the sufficiency of briefs, the application of the rules may not be relaxed to the point of requiring the court to search the record for grounds to reverse a judgment. p. 129.

From the Perry Circuit Court; Samuel A. Lambdin, Special Judge.

Ejectment proceedings between Mrs. James Albertson and others and James Nix and others. From the judgment entered, Mrs. James Albertson appealed.

Affirmed. By the court in banc.

Robert S. Wagoner and L.N. Savage, both of Rockport, for appellants.

Daniel C. Goble, of Cannelton, for appellees.


This is an attempt to appeal from a judgment of the Perry Circuit Court in an ejectment proceeding.

The appellees have not questioned the sufficiency of appellants' brief. However, this court is bound by the Rules of the Supreme Court. Appellants' brief wholly fails to comply 1. with Rule 2-17. It does not set out the judgment of the trial court, the motion for a new trial or the substance thereof, the exhibit which it is asserted was erroneously admitted in evidence, or the substance of said exhibit.

While this court indulges a practical liberality in passing upon the sufficiency of briefs, the application of the rules may not be relaxed to the point of requiring us to search the 2. record for grounds to reverse a judgment. Wabash Township, Gibson County et al. v. Cooper et al. (1943), 221 Ind. 304, 47 N.E.2d 611.

No question having been presented, the judgment of the Perry Circuit Court is affirmed.

NOTE. — Reported in 57 N.E.2d 206.


Summaries of

ALBERTSON v. NIX

Court of Appeals of Indiana
Oct 23, 1944
115 Ind. App. 128 (Ind. Ct. App. 1944)
Case details for

ALBERTSON v. NIX

Case Details

Full title:ALBERTSON ET AL. v. NIX ET AL

Court:Court of Appeals of Indiana

Date published: Oct 23, 1944

Citations

115 Ind. App. 128 (Ind. Ct. App. 1944)
57 N.E.2d 206

Citing Cases

Wilson v. Dexter, Executor

Therefore, the validity of the contract stands before us unchallenged and we will not search the record to…

Wills v. Motorists Mutual Insurance Co.

The rules are binding alike on the courts and the litigants and even though practical liberality of…