From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Alberts v. Lee

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Feb 5, 2014
552 F. App'x 986 (Fed. Cir. 2014)

Opinion

2013-1259

02-05-2014

AUDREY M. ALBERTS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. MICHELLE K. LEE, Deputy Director, United States Patent and Trademark Office, Defendant-Appellee..

WESLEY W. MONROE, Christie, Parker & Hale, LLP, of Glendale, California, argued for plaintiff-appellant. FARHEENA Y. RASHEED, Associate Solicitor, United States Patent and Trademark Office, of Alexandria, Virginia, argued for defendant-appellee. With her on the brief were NATHAN K. KELLEY, Acting Solicitor, and FRANCES M. LYNCH, Associate Solicitor.


NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia in No. 10-CV-1727, Judge James E. Boasberg.

JUDGMENT

WESLEY W. MONROE, Christie, Parker & Hale, LLP, of Glendale, California, argued for plaintiff-appellant.

FARHEENA Y. RASHEED, Associate Solicitor, United States Patent and Trademark Office, of Alexandria, Virginia, argued for defendant-appellee. With her on the brief were NATHAN K. KELLEY, Acting Solicitor, and FRANCES M. LYNCH, Associate Solicitor. THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (RADER, Chief Judge, NEWMAN, and DYK, Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

__________________________

Daniel E. O'Toole

Clerk of Court


Summaries of

Alberts v. Lee

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Feb 5, 2014
552 F. App'x 986 (Fed. Cir. 2014)
Case details for

Alberts v. Lee

Case Details

Full title:AUDREY M. ALBERTS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. MICHELLE K. LEE, Deputy…

Court:United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Date published: Feb 5, 2014

Citations

552 F. App'x 986 (Fed. Cir. 2014)

Citing Cases

Dome Patent, L.P. v. Rea

A party subject to an adverse reexamination decision by the Board may seek review of that decision in this…