Opinion
November 24, 1998
Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County (Edward Lehner, J.).
While the majority of plaintiffs' interrogatories and document demands are germane to the action and phrased so as to state intelligible questions and requests sufficiently narrow to permit responses, the numbers listed above are overly broad, unduly burdensome, irrelevant or vague, and are therefore struck, but do not necessitate vacating plaintiffs' interrogatories or document demands in their entirety, and defendant is directed to otherwise comply therewith ( see, Zohar v. Hair Club For Men, 200 A.D.2d 453). Defendant's motion papers set forth the specific interrogatories and discovery requests to which plaintiffs have not fully complied, and plaintiffs should comply therewith.
Concur — Lerner, P. J., Williams, Tom and Andrias, JJ.