From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Albert v. Stumpf

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 17, 1968
30 A.D.2d 686 (N.Y. App. Div. 1968)

Opinion

June 17, 1968


In a negligence action to recover damages for personal injuries, plaintiff appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County, entered February 15, 1968, in favor of defendant upon a jury verdict. Judgment reversed, on the law, and new trial granted, with costs to plaintiff to abide the event. The findings of fact are affirmed. It was error to admit into evidence that portion of a police officer's accident report which set forth his opinion as to the cause of the accident ( Marcus v. Greenwald, 28 A.D.2d 680; Lea v. Segreto, 23 A.D.2d 759). The trial court's subsequent curative instruction to the jury was not in language sufficiently explicit to preclude any inference that the jury might have been affected by it, in view of the highly prejudicial effect of this evidence in this close case (cf. Smulczeski v. City Center of Music Drama, 3 N.Y.2d 498, 501; Robinson v. City of New York, 5 A.D.2d 197, 199). Beldock, P.J., Christ, Brennan, Hopkins and Benjamin, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Albert v. Stumpf

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 17, 1968
30 A.D.2d 686 (N.Y. App. Div. 1968)
Case details for

Albert v. Stumpf

Case Details

Full title:ALLEN D. ALBERT, Appellant, v. THELMA G. STUMPF, Respondent

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jun 17, 1968

Citations

30 A.D.2d 686 (N.Y. App. Div. 1968)

Citing Cases

Westmoreland v. Wilgo Realty Corp.

We are also of the opinion that, under the proof adduced by plaintiffs, there were questions of fact for the…

Toll v. State of N.Y

Here, the collision not having been witnessed by the State trooper and there being no proof that whoever gave…