From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ala. Ass'n of Realtors v. Dep't of Health & Human Servs.

SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
Jun 29, 2021
141 S. Ct. 2320 (2021)

Opinion

No. 20A169

06-29-2021

ALABAMA ASSOCIATION OF REALTORS, et al. v. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, et al.


The application to vacate stay presented to THE CHIEF JUSTICE and by him referred to the Court is denied.

Justice THOMAS, Justice ALITO, Justice GORSUCH, and Justice BARRETT would grant the application.

Justice KAVANAUGH, concurring.

I agree with the District Court and the applicants that the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention exceeded its existing statutory authority by issuing a nationwide eviction moratorium. See Utility Air Regulatory Group v. EPA , 573 U.S. 302, 324, 134 S.Ct. 2427, 189 L.Ed.2d 372 (2014). Because the CDC plans to end the moratorium in only a few weeks, on July 31, and because those few weeks will allow for additional and more orderly distribution of the congressionally appropriated rental assistance funds, I vote at this time to deny the application to vacate the District Court's stay of its order. See Barnes v. E-Systems, Inc. Group Hospital Medical & Surgical Ins. Plan , 501 U.S. 1301, 1305, 112 S.Ct. 1, 115 L.Ed.2d 1087 (1991) (Scalia, J., in chambers) (stay depends in part on balance of equities); Coleman v. Paccar Inc. , 424 U.S. 1301, 1304, 96 S.Ct. 845, 47 L.Ed.2d 67 (1976) (Rehnquist, J., in chambers). In my view, clear and specific congressional authorization (via new legislation) would be necessary for the CDC to extend the moratorium past July 31.


Summaries of

Ala. Ass'n of Realtors v. Dep't of Health & Human Servs.

SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
Jun 29, 2021
141 S. Ct. 2320 (2021)
Case details for

Ala. Ass'n of Realtors v. Dep't of Health & Human Servs.

Case Details

Full title:ALABAMA ASSOCIATION OF REALTORS, ET AL. v. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN…

Court:SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

Date published: Jun 29, 2021

Citations

141 S. Ct. 2320 (2021)

Citing Cases

Tiger Lily, LLC v. United States Dep't of Housing & Urban Dev.

There is no clear expression of congressional intent in § 264 to convey such an expansive grant of agency…

Ohio v. Yellen

The point is simply this—when Congress seeks to alter the constitutional design by delegating its powers to…