From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Akins v. Froisland

Nebraska Court of Appeals
Jan 1, 2006
No. A-05-855 (Neb. Ct. App. Jan. 1, 2006)

Opinion

No. A-05-855.

2006


Cases Disposed of Without Opinion.

Motion for summary affirmance sustained.

See, rule 7B(2); Farmer v. Brennan, 511 U.S. 825, 114 S. Ct. 1970, 128 L. Ed. 2d 811 (1994); Estelle v. Gamble, 429 U.S. 97, 97 S. Ct. 285, 50 L. Ed. 2d 251 (1976); Revels v. Vincenz, 382 F.3d 870 (8th Cir. 2004), cert. denied, Revels v. Wimp, 546 U.S. 860, 126 S. Ct. 371, 163 L. Ed. 2d 140 (2005); LeMaire v. Maass, 12 F.3d 1444 (9th Cir. 1993); Wishon v. Gammon, 978 F.2d 446 (8th Cir. 1992); Shearer v. Leuenberger, 256 Neb. 566, 591 N.W.2d 762 (1999), disapproved on other grounds, Simon v. City of Omaha, 267 Neb. 718, 677 N.W.2d 129 (2004); Newton v. Huffman, 10 Neb. App. 390, 632 N.W.2d 344 (2001).


Summaries of

Akins v. Froisland

Nebraska Court of Appeals
Jan 1, 2006
No. A-05-855 (Neb. Ct. App. Jan. 1, 2006)
Case details for

Akins v. Froisland

Case Details

Full title:Akins v. Froisland

Court:Nebraska Court of Appeals

Date published: Jan 1, 2006

Citations

No. A-05-855 (Neb. Ct. App. Jan. 1, 2006)