Akbar v. Babcock

Full title: Muhammad Akbar, Petitioner, v. M.R. Babcock, Warden, et al. (BOP), and…

Court: United States District Court, D. Minnesota

Date published: Sep 21, 2009

Civil No. 09-810 (DSD/SRN) (D. Minn. Sep. 21, 2009)

Opinion

Civil No. 09-810 (DSD/SRN).

September 21, 2009

ORDER

DAVID DOTY, Senior District Judge

This matter is before the court upon petitioner's pro se objections to the report and recommendation of Magistrate Judge Susan Richard Nelson dated July 29, 2009. In her report, the magistrate judge recommends that petitioner's application for habeas corpus relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 be denied on the merits and because petitioner has not exhausted his administrative remedies.

The court reviews the report and recommendation of the magistrate judge de novo. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C); Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(b)(3); D. Minn. LR 72.2(b). After a de novo review, the court finds that the report and recommendation of the magistrate judge is well reasoned and correctly disposes of petitioner's motion. Therefore, the court adopts the report and recommendation [Doc. No. 13] in its entirety.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that petitioner's application for habeas corpus relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 [Doc. No. 1] be dismissed.

LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY.