From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ain v. Three School Street

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 14, 2004
8 A.D.3d 413 (N.Y. App. Div. 2004)

Opinion

2003-09964.

Decided June 14, 2004.

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the defendant appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (O'Connell, J.), dated October 15, 2003, which, upon a jury verdict on the issue of liability, finding the plaintiff Jacob Ain 40% at fault and it 60% at fault in the happening of the accident, and upon the denial of its motion pursuant to CPLR 4404(a), to set aside the verdict and for judgment in its favor as a matter of law, is in favor of the plaintiffs and against it.

Greenfield Reilly (Carol R. Finocchio, New York, N.Y. [Mary Ellen O'Brien] of counsel), for appellant.

Tip Henderson, Glen Cove, N.Y., for respondents.

Before: HOWARD MILLER, J.P. GLORIA GOLDSTEIN, DANIEL F. LUCIANO, ROBERT A. SPOLZINO, JJ.


DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.

Contrary to the appellant's contention, the evidence did not support the conclusion that the elevation between two surfaces of the sidewalk, upon which the injured plaintiff tripped and fell, was a defect too trivial to be actionable ( see Smith v. A.B.K. Apts., 284 A.D.2d 323; Sanna v. Wal-Mart Stores, 271 A.D.2d 595; Nin v. Bernard, 257 A.D.2d 417).

The appellant's remaining contentions are without merit.

H. MILLER, J.P., GOLDSTEIN, LUCIANO and SPOLZINO, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Ain v. Three School Street

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 14, 2004
8 A.D.3d 413 (N.Y. App. Div. 2004)
Case details for

Ain v. Three School Street

Case Details

Full title:JACOB AIN, ET AL., respondents, v. THREE SCHOOL STREET, ETC., appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jun 14, 2004

Citations

8 A.D.3d 413 (N.Y. App. Div. 2004)
778 N.Y.S.2d 308

Citing Cases

Turuseta v. Wyassup-Laurel Glen Corp.

Upon our scrutiny of the photographs authenticated by the plaintiff and the defendants' fact witness and the…

Rutigliano v. Sachem Cent. Sch. Dist.

Whether a particular height difference between sidewalk slabs constitutes a trivial defect is generally a…