From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ahern v. Shepherd

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Nov 29, 2011
89 A.D.3d 1046 (N.Y. App. Div. 2011)

Opinion

2011-11-29

Edward J. AHERN, etc., appellant, v. Steven W. SHEPHERD, respondent.

James E. Bahamonde, P.C., North Bellmore, N.Y., for appellant. Mazzei & Blair, Blue Point, N.Y. (Patricia Byrne Blair of counsel), for respondent.


James E. Bahamonde, P.C., North Bellmore, N.Y., for appellant. Mazzei & Blair, Blue Point, N.Y. (Patricia Byrne Blair of counsel), for respondent.

In an action, inter alia, for injunctive relief and to recover damages for discrimination in the access to and use of a public accommodation on the basis of disability in violation of the Americans with Disabilities Act (42 USC § 12101 et seq.), Executive Law § 296, and Civil Rights Law § 40–c, the plaintiff appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Gazzillo, J.), dated June 16, 2010, as denied his cross motion for summary judgment on the complaint.

ORDERED that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

CPLR 3212(b) provides that “[a] motion for summary judgment shall be supported by affidavit, by a copy of the pleadings and by other available proof, such as depositions and written admissions.” Here, the Supreme Court properly denied the plaintiff's cross motion for summary judgment because he failed to include a copy of the pleadings in support of his cross motion, as required by CPLR 3212(b) ( see Fiber Consultants, Inc. v. Fiber Optek Interconnect Corp., 84 A.D.3d 1153, 924 N.Y.S.2d 276; Liberty Doorworks, Inc. v. Baranello, 83 A.D.3d 1011, 921 N.Y.S.2d 561; Matter of Fraternal Order of Eagles v. Board of Assessors, 73 A.D.3d 770, 899 N.Y.S.2d 853; Zellner v. Tarnell, 54 A.D.3d 329, 861 N.Y.S.2d 598; Sendor v. Chervin, 51 A.D.3d 1003, 857 N.Y.S.2d 500; Thompson v. Foreign Cars Ctr., Inc., 40 A.D.3d 965, 837 N.Y.S.2d 673; Matsyuk v. Konkalipos, 35 A.D.3d 675, 824 N.Y.S.2d 918; Wider v. Heller, 24 A.D.3d 433, 434, 805 N.Y.S.2d 130; Sted Tenants Owners Corp. v. Chumpitaz, 5 A.D.3d 663, 774 N.Y.S.2d 718).

In light of our determination, we need not reach the plaintiff's remaining contention.

MASTRO, J.P., FLORIO, LOTT and COHEN, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Ahern v. Shepherd

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Nov 29, 2011
89 A.D.3d 1046 (N.Y. App. Div. 2011)
Case details for

Ahern v. Shepherd

Case Details

Full title:Edward J. AHERN, etc., appellant, v. Steven W. SHEPHERD, respondent.

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.

Date published: Nov 29, 2011

Citations

89 A.D.3d 1046 (N.Y. App. Div. 2011)
933 N.Y.S.2d 597
2011 N.Y. Slip Op. 8715

Citing Cases

Roberts v. State

The CPLR provides, in pertinent part, that a motion for summary judgment shall "be supported by affidavit, by…

Moreau v. State

In the absence of a pending motion to dismiss by defendant, the Court cannot render a determination with…