From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ah Goon v. Superior Court

Supreme Court of California
Oct 12, 1882
61 Cal. 555 (Cal. 1882)

Opinion

Department One

Application for writ of prohibition to the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco. Lawler, J.

COUNSEL

T. C. Van Ness, for plaintiff, cited C. C. P., § 387; Louisiana Code Prac., §§ 389-394; Hittell's Gen. Laws, Arts. 5587-5590; Hocker v. Kelley, 14 Cal. 164; N. Bloomfield G. M. Co. v. Keyser, 58 Id. 315; Quimbo Appo v. The People, 20 N.Y. 531.

William Matthews, for defendant, cited Wreden v. Superior Court , 55 Cal. 504; Camron v. Kenfield , 57 id. 553; Clark v. Crane, id. 634; Maurer v. Mitchell , 53 id. 292; Clark v. Minnis , 50 id. 510; Coburn v. Smart , 53 id. 742.


OPINION The Court:

Petitioner for the writ of prohibition claims that Section 387 of the Code of Civil Procedure confers a special and limited jurisdiction on the Superior Court, which can be exercised only in case the complaint in intervention is both filed and served " before the trial."

In the case before us the order permitting intervenor to become a party was made, and the written intervention filed, before the trial. But before service of the complaint of intervenor, plaintiff and defendant proceeded to try the issues between them, which was doubtless irregular unless the attempt to intervene was void .

Without admitting that the jurisdiction of the Superior Court with respect to the matter of intervention is, in the strict sense, statutory and limited, even if this much should be admitted, the Court below acquired jurisdiction by the order permitting the intervenor to become a party. A person may intervene before the trial. ( C. C. P., 387.) An intervention " takes place when the order is made permitting such person to become a party." (Id.) The complaint in intervention is filed when " leave of the Court" is granted, which necessarily precedes its service.

Of course when the complaint in intervention is filed (by leave of the Court) a trial before its service on the party against whom the intervenor asserts an adverse claim is premature; but an erroneous procedure in that regard does not involve any question of jurisdiction.

Demurrer sustained.


Summaries of

Ah Goon v. Superior Court

Supreme Court of California
Oct 12, 1882
61 Cal. 555 (Cal. 1882)
Case details for

Ah Goon v. Superior Court

Case Details

Full title:AH GOON v. THE SUPERIOR COURT

Court:Supreme Court of California

Date published: Oct 12, 1882

Citations

61 Cal. 555 (Cal. 1882)

Citing Cases

Walcott v. Wells

The filing of the answer, whether served or not, prevented the clerk from dismissing the action, and gave the…

State ex Rel. Sands v. District Court

Whether the court properly allowed the intervener to intervene, and whether it properly restricted the issues…