From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Agbaosi v. Garland

United States District Court, Central District of California
Jan 28, 2022
5:20-cv-01123-JWH-KKx (C.D. Cal. Jan. 28, 2022)

Opinion

5:20-cv-01123-JWH-KKx

01-28-2022

MATTHEW S. AGBAOSI, Plaintiff, v. MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General, CYNTHIA SWAIN, Warden, Federal Correctional Institution, California, KEVIN YOUNG, Associate Warden (AW) at Victorville, SANDRA JOHN, Supervisor of Education, and DOES 1-10, inclusive, Defendants.


JUDGMENT

JOHN W. HOLCOMB UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Pursuant to the Order filed concurrently herewith, and in accordance with Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, it is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED as follows:

1. This Court possesses subject matter jurisdiction over the above-captioned action pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1331.

2. Defendants Cynthia Swain, Kevin Young, and Sandra John were previously DISMISSED without prejudice by stipulation of the parties, pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

3. Fictitiously named Defendants Does 1-10, inclusive, are DISMISSED.

4. Defendant Attorney General Merrick B. Garland shall have JUDGMENT in his favor, and against Plaintiff Matthew S. Agbaosi. Plaintiff Agbaosi shall take nothing by way of his complaint. This action is DISMISSED.

5. Other than potential post-judgment remedies (including those provided in Rule 54(d) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure), to the extent that any party requests any other form of relief, such request is DENIED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Agbaosi v. Garland

United States District Court, Central District of California
Jan 28, 2022
5:20-cv-01123-JWH-KKx (C.D. Cal. Jan. 28, 2022)
Case details for

Agbaosi v. Garland

Case Details

Full title:MATTHEW S. AGBAOSI, Plaintiff, v. MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General…

Court:United States District Court, Central District of California

Date published: Jan 28, 2022

Citations

5:20-cv-01123-JWH-KKx (C.D. Cal. Jan. 28, 2022)

Citing Cases

Wallace v. Wormuth

Other courts have continued to do so even after Babb. See, e.g., Patterson v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec., 834…

Smith v. Dep't of Pub. Soc. Servs.

Under this specific Title VII statutory scheme, “an aggrieved employee [could] file a civil action in a…