From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Aero-Bocker Corporation v. Axelrod

Supreme Court, New York County
Mar 29, 1930
136 Misc. 521 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 1930)

Opinion

March 29, 1930.

Gordon S.P. Kleeberg and Jacob Greenwald, for the plaintiffs.

Alexander Lehman [ Sidney Handler of counsel], for the defendant Saul Axelrod.



Motion is denied. The court cannot on the pleadings in advance of a trial hold as a matter of law that the contract relied upon by plaintiff is such as to warrant a finding that it is void because of the claim of monopoly and general restraint of trade. The rule laid down in the earlier cases cited by the movant in support of the motion is not conclusive authority for the application of the then existing rule to the present day conditions. The law to be applied to the contracts, the subject of this action, is a matter for the trial court after the facts are established to a certainty. Order signed.


Summaries of

Aero-Bocker Corporation v. Axelrod

Supreme Court, New York County
Mar 29, 1930
136 Misc. 521 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 1930)
Case details for

Aero-Bocker Corporation v. Axelrod

Case Details

Full title:AERO-BOCKER CORPORATION and IRVING ROTHLEIN, Plaintiffs, v. SAUL AXELROD…

Court:Supreme Court, New York County

Date published: Mar 29, 1930

Citations

136 Misc. 521 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 1930)
241 N.Y.S. 158

Citing Cases

WIDDER DYE CHEMICAL v. UNITED STATES MARKING TAG

( Ru Ton v. Everitt, 35 App. Div. 412; Edgecomb v. Edmonston, 257 Mass. 12; Hill v. Central West Public…