From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Advanced Tech. & Materials Co. v. United States

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Nov 13, 2013
541 F. App'x 1002 (Fed. Cir. 2013)

Opinion

2013-1305

11-13-2013

ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY & MATERIALS CO., LTD., BEIJING GANG YAN DIAMOND PRODUCTS COMPANY, AND GANG YAN DIAMOND PRODUCTS INC., Plaintiffs-Appellants, AND BOSUN TOOLS GROUPS CO., LTD., Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES, Defendant, AND DIAMOND SAWBLADES MANUFACTURERS COALITION, Defendant-Appellee, AND WEIHAI XIANGGUANG MECHANICAL INDUSTRIAL CO., LTD. AND QINGDAO SHINHAN DIAMOND INDUSTRIAL CO., LTD., Defendants.

JEFFREY S. NEELEY, Barnes, Richardson & Colburn, LLP, of Washington, DC, argued for plaintiffs-appellants. With him on the brief were MICHAEL S. HOLTON, and STEPHEN W. BROPHY. DANIEL B. PICKARD, Wiley Rein LLP, of Washington, DC, argued for defendants-appellees. With him on the brief was MAUREEN E. THORSON. Of counsel was TESSA V. CAPELOTO.


NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

Appeals from the United States Court of International Trade in No. 09-CV-0511 and 06-CV-0246, Senior Judge R. Kenton Musgrave.

JUDGMENT

JEFFREY S. NEELEY, Barnes, Richardson & Colburn, LLP, of Washington, DC, argued for plaintiffs-appellants. With him on the brief were MICHAEL S. HOLTON, and STEPHEN W. BROPHY.

DANIEL B. PICKARD, Wiley Rein LLP, of Washington, DC, argued for defendants-appellees. With him on the brief was MAUREEN E. THORSON. Of counsel was TESSA V. CAPELOTO. THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (LOURIE, BRYSON, and O'MALLEY, Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

_______________

Daniel E. O'Toole

Clerk of Court


Summaries of

Advanced Tech. & Materials Co. v. United States

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Nov 13, 2013
541 F. App'x 1002 (Fed. Cir. 2013)
Case details for

Advanced Tech. & Materials Co. v. United States

Case Details

Full title:ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY & MATERIALS CO., LTD., BEIJING GANG YAN DIAMOND…

Court:United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Date published: Nov 13, 2013

Citations

541 F. App'x 1002 (Fed. Cir. 2013)

Citing Cases

Diamond Sawblades Mfrs. Coal. v. United States

Id. ATM's status as part of the PRC-wide entity meant that it did not qualify for a separate rate. Id. The…

China Mfrs. All., LLC v. United States

On that remand, Commerce determined that ATM had failed to rebut the presumption of government control and…